Could Jesus have been homosexual? Well yes, but is it likely? Absolutely not, so could the disciple leaning on Jesus' breast, have been a female.
There is ample evidence left in the New Testament to show that John Zebedee, the disciple Jesus loved, was in fact a female called JOAN Zebedee, alias Mary Magdalene, before the pagan Roman Christians deleted any reference confirming the humanity of Jesus.
These are the women who would have, and did, attend Jesus at the cross, and again at His tomb on the third day. His mother Mary, Mary’s sister as support for His mother, His wife John Joan Zebedee, alias Mary Magdalene, and His mother-in-law Salome Zebedee, to support her daughter.
Little is known about the author of the Gospel of John. However, some of it was obviously written by John Joan Zebedee, the disciple Jesus loved. Apart from John the Baptist, the name John is never mentioned in the Gospel at all, so calling the fourth Gospel "John" is generally accepted as supposition. John is the last of the four Gospels in the New Testament and is thought to have been written towards the end of the 1st century A.D. in or around the Greek city of Ephesus. Ephesus is where I believe John Joan Zebedee, the disciple Jesus loved, took her Mother-in-law, Mary of Nazareth, to, soon after Jesus ascended to His glorious rest.
The Gospel of John, also does not mention a number of quite distinctive features; for example, there is no nativity scene, no description whatever of Jesus’ birth, which is as you would expect if the Pauline Christians plagiarized the virgin birth from Isaiah 7:14, which I am certain they did, to prove Paul's claim after he thought he saw Him alive on the road to Damascus, deducing that He must be either God, the son of God or both. And so, the nativity scene would not have been the magnificent event described by Paul and his disciples. Certainly, the three wise men, descended from Ham, would not have been celebrating the arrival of the One sent to defeat satan and his soldiers.
Could Jesus have been homosexual? Well yes, but is it likely? Absolutely not, so the disciple leaning on Jesus' breast, must have been a female. Sorry about the odd-looking images of Jesus and His disciples. As a matter of interest, a direct descendant of Seth in the line of the Messiah, such as Jesus, would have been both physically and spiritually white. However, other descendants may have received a trace of colour if a forefather had married a female of Ham, but they would still be spiritually white, and still only able to be spoken to by God. However, Since the 'prince of this world' was Judged in 1945, God is now able to inspire everyone, male or female, of any race or persuasion.
John 13:23-25, together with Isa 42:1-3, Isa 11:1a, Isa 53:10, confirm that Jesus was chosen by God and married to the disciple He loved, i.e., John Joan Zebedee, alias Mary Magdalene, sister of the widow Martha, nee Zebedee. Lazareth never existed, the Pauline Christians made up many false miracles to ensure that the Gentiles quickly sought out the ensign, Isa 11:10 including raising Lazareth from the dead, walking on water, turning water into wine, probably even the whole unnecessary story of the betrayal of Jesus by Judas, and many other overly miraculous miracles. Jesus’ wife, Joan, was given the nick name Mary Magdalene, and besmirched as a prostitute, to further de-humanize Jesus by hiding His marital state. The Gospel of John includes some of the most adulterated text, especially in the early chapters, but also includes some of the most profound text of the four Gospels; John 1:1-3 being the worst and John 14,16 and John 19:25-27 below, some of the best. Apart from the adulteration of the early chapters, John is the most prophetic and meaningful of them all and I believe it was written by Jesus' wife Joan .
The following is strong evidence that Jesus was married to “The disciple that Jesus loved”, John Joan Zebedee, and that she, together with her brother James Zebedee, were probably Jesus’ first disciples. Paul's version of Christianity rises or falls on the answer to whether Jesus was married or not.
John 19:25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus, his mother, his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. Four women; His mother, His aunt (in support of His mother), Cleophas’s wife, and Mary Magdalene. 26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother and the disciple standing by whom he loved, he saith unto His mother, Woman, behold thy son! By a process of elimination, the disciple Jesus loved would not be His mother, I also think we can rule out His aunt, as we can Mary, the wife of Cleophas, so we can only conclude that Mary Magdalene was ‘The disciple Jesus loved, the fourth person standing by. 27 Then saith He to the disciple that He loved, Behold THY MOTHER! Not My mother, but THY MOTHER, even though Mary Magdalene's mother was not mentioned. However, if Jesus and John Joan Zebedee, alias Mary Magdalene, were husband and wife, as I am certain they were, then all that is missing from this sentence is, “in-law”, Jesus was saying to his wife, "Behold (my mother) thy mother-IN-LAW" and from that hour, John Joan took her mother-IN-LAW, Jesus' mother, Mary, the paternal grandmother of Jesus’ seed, Isa 53:10, unto her own home. Jesus was asking His wife to look after His mother, as you would expect.
Having said that, I am quite sure Cleophas’s wife is either a mistake or a deliberate omission by the Pauline Christians, the fourth women would have been Salome Zebedee, as per Mark 15:40, John Joan Zebedee’s mother. Salome would have been there as moral support for her daughter, Joan, as would have been Jesus’ aunt as support for His mother, Mary. This does not weaken my argument that the disciple Jesus loved, took her widowed-mother-in-law to her home. It is unlikely that John Joan Zebedee, alias Mary Magdalene, would have chosen that moment to take her OWN mother home. Undoubtedly, it was Joan, her mother-in-law and Jesus’ children who would need to be removed from Jerusalem for protection from the Jews. Mark 15:41 has been added to trivialise the fact that Salome was there at the cross for her daughter, not Cleophas’s wife Mary
Although I am quite sure that Mary Magdalene was really the disciple John Joan Zebedee, after 2000 years of silence as to what became of this little family, it is probably impossible now to provide absolute proof. The best I could come up with, was that Joan Zebedee, still being called Mary Magdalene, and her children, having hastily left Jerusalem for protection, passed through Ephesus and were reported to have been seen in France. From there, over the years, I can only guess that Joan, her children, and grandchildren, would have slowly surrendered their version of what happened, and accepted the Roman Catholic version. Eventually, her descendants reached England in time for one of them, the then host of God, to supervise the destruction of the prince of this world in Germany, in 1945.
I believe that excludes the possibility that James’ ever had a brother John, let alone that John received revelations from Jesus while he was incarcerated in Patmos. I am not the first person to discredit Revelations and I am sure I will not be the last. I was first inspired 35 years ago that Revelations was just mythical nonsense adulterating the message of Jesus and should never have been included in the Bible in the first place. In fact, it was not, until the 5th century. Not even Constantine, the prime adulterer, saw fit to include such threats of death and destruction as inducement to become a Christian. Jesus said everything He wanted to say to His disciples. Paul’s adulteration of the phenomenon that was Jesus, and revelations, were both part of God’s plan to antagonise the Jews against the Paulene Christians and vice versa, to deceive satan into a false sense of security that would eventually lead him believing that these, as yet, pagan barbarian descendants of Japheth, would not come to the rescue of God’s soldiers, if he attempted to exterminate them. But they did in 1939, and so the ‘prince of this world' was finally judged in 1945. And as per John 16:11, that event was the catalyst for the Spirit of Jesus, i.e., the Branch, to grow out of the Rod and return as the Holy Ghost, i.e., the Spirit of Truth.
Although I do not believe we need any more proof that Jesus was married to Joan Zebedee, there are many other instances where it is obvious that the disciple Jesus loved was His wife, Joan Zebedee.
John 13:23 Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.” 24 Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him her, that he she should ask who it should be of whom he spake.
”25 He She then lying on Jesus' breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it? This reply to Peter is just so obviously what, and how, a wife would talk to her husband.
Mark 16:1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him. These three women are exactly who you would expect to be at the tomb of Jesus to anoint Him. Although once again disguised to hide the matrimonial state of Jesus, by calling them, Mary Magdalene, and Mary, the mother of James, and Salome, it is obvious they are Jesus’ wife, Joan Zebedee, Joan’s mother, Salome Zebedee to support her daughter, and Mary, the mother of James and Jesus.
Mathew 20:20 Then came to him the mother of Zebedee's children with her son and daughter worshipping him and desiring a certain thing of him.”
21 And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my daughter Joan and my son James may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.” Not an unreasonable request from their mother to her Son in law, that His wife would sit on His right hand, and His brother-in-law on His left.
And well you might ask, what was Jesus doing after he was resurrected, when he was not with His disciples. I have no doubt that His wife would have insisted that He spend most of his time with his wife and children.
The Spirit of Truth (The Branch growing out of the Rod).
God bless all who acknowledge the sacrifice of Jesus
and enlighten those who do not yet.
Comments